Is participation the new black? (& Industry Day at the Participatory Design Conference 2010)

I'm thrilled/challenged/excited/nervous to be helping to organise the first Industry Day for this year's Participatory Design Conference.

While you can check out the call for participation for more specific details on the conference I wanted to provide a brief background on why I personally think this is important, and of course invite and encourage everyone to consider being involved.

Firstly, I believe opportunities to try and foster dialogue and collaboration and sharing of ideas between practitioners in industry and those working more in academic contexts are really important. And I also believe such a collaboration is especially important to design right now.

Notions of participation in design and use, - what it might mean and how it can be enabled have changed radically even in just the last few years - for starters it is a much more visible concept in a lot of different places. The concurrent energies around civic engagement, co-design, open design, community design, crowdsourcing, open innovation and co-creation are all contributing to, and influencing how, participation is being re-defined (in different ways at different times by different people). Creating a space for dialogue where academic theory and practice can be sharpened and invigorated by experiences and experiments from industry practice, and via versa, will, I hope, help us to grapple with some of the issues and questions inevitably emerging out of these shifts.

The Participatory Design Conference is an interesting locale to do this because it has always been an important venue for international discussion of the collaborative, social and political dimensions of technology innovation and use. Questions of participation are questions of politics, control and power. As more and more of our systems and services become mediated through technology, the need for participatory approaches to the design of those systems only becomes more urgent. (Think Facebook and privacy, or maybe open government).

Participatory Design is one of the few (I believe) design and technology forums where the politics of design has always been at the forefront - and we need more of this critical thinking behind us as we move towards new spaces of collaboration - to ensure that participation isn't just "the new black".

I'm excited about Industry Day at PDC to bring together local and international researchers and practitioners around the issues of participation in all the forms they may currently take. This is the first time there has been an Industry Day at PDC, it will be a bit experimental in itself - and probably quite intimate - but I think the opportunity to bring together local and international practitioners and researchers around questions of participation (and how technology can support that) is a valuable one.

Please Consider Submitting a Case Study!


The conference this year is being held in Sydney, Australia, the first time in the Southern Hemisphere, which is great for those us down under, but a fair distance for most others. We are currently looking into ways we might support remote participation, and are happy to hear from people who might want to have some form of non physical presence :) And of course we can extend the discussion here too.

More info
www.pdc2010.org/industry @pdcsyd

Thanks
Penny
(some definitions below of what I mean by PD)

What is Participatory Design?
Participatory Design is a diverse collection of principles and practices aimed at making technologies, tools, environments, businesses, services and social institutions more responsive to human needs. A central tenet of Participatory Design is the direct involvement of people in the co-design of things and technologies they use.



Participatory Design has its roots in the Scandinavian labour movement of the 70’s and over the years has broadened its impact to areas such as health care, international development, civic engagement, local government, education, communications, agile software development, new media, architecture, the arts and more. Methods that are becoming common in industry today such as co-operative prototyping, future workshops and scenarios had their origins in early Participatory Design research.

More about the Participatory Design conference



Views: 9

Tags: participatorydesign

Add a Comment

You need to be a member of Design Thinking Network to add comments!

Join Design Thinking Network

Comment by penny hagen on June 9, 2010 at 9:17
Also, perhaps this is a place to follow your lead Stefan and share other references that might be of interest? [to be continued...]
Comment by penny hagen on June 8, 2010 at 23:17
Thanks for your comments Stefan - Absolutely! So much more could be said about the contributions of these people and others and the ongoing relevance of PD into new areas such as Service Design - (and my humble apologies if my post suggested otherwise).

Happily Jeanette is working with me on Industry Day along with Ellen Balka and we anticipate continued discussion around issues such as PD and Service design that papers like your progressed.

I hope to see you in Sydney in December!
Comment by Stefan Holmlid on June 8, 2010 at 19:00
Participation, transformation, involvement, stakeholders, emancipation... PD has brought important fundaments along since the 70's; and don't forget the work by Lucy Suchman and Jeanette Blomberg, e.g. In a paper for the first ServDes conference in Oslo in 2009, I wrote a piece where I tried to connect the ideas of participation and involvement in service design to the tradition of PD; see http://www.aho.no/servicedesign09

/Stefan

DesignThinkers Academy

Connect to us

----------------------------------------

----------------------------------------

Forum

Evaluating Design's ROI

Started by Maddy. Last reply by Lyden Foust Apr 11. 63 Replies

I'm working towards my Master thesis with Design ROI as the focus. So , How can the value of design be proved by demonstrating the ROI?I know design is used to differentiate and entice users and it would be invariably hard to pin down it's value but…Continue

Tags: Innovation, ROI, Design, Business

Starting up a Start-up. How to start a service design business?

Started by ricardojdc. Last reply by Lyden Foust Apr 7. 28 Replies

This discussion follows from my interest in the fields of design thinking / service design and the perception that my country lacks such services. My immediate reaction was: "why not starting such a business?"However, some worries (in no particular…Continue

Is design thinking marketing 2.0 ?

Started by Arne van Oosterom. Last reply by Richard Hewitt Jul 27, 2012. 26 Replies

The 'market' will stay. The need for companies to reach that market will stay. But methods will change.Could design thinking be a new marketing method? Marketing 2.0? Will design thinking be integrated within the more traditional methods? Or will…Continue

WENOVSKI...? let's put our minds together!

Started by Arne van Oosterom. Last reply by Daniel Weiss Sep 3, 2011. 22 Replies

WENOVSKI is a new network of creative minds... but there are so many other network. Is there something valuable we can add? A design thinkers event? Projects/ cases to collaborate on?Let's put our minds together.Tell me: What would be useful to you?…Continue

Events

© 2013   Created by Arne van Oosterom.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service

Offline

Live Video